Fuel for Biofuel 3: Cellulosic feedstocks

In the last post, we established that cellulosic feedstock are somewhat more complicated in their molecular structure than a corn feedstock.  What are the main feedstocks being considered for commercialisation? What are the fuels they are used to produce?

Corn and sugarcane are known as the feedstocks for first generation biofuels. Other feedstocks are called advanced biofuels but these still consist of ethanol and biodiesel. Biodiesel is produced from the triacylglycerides obtained from soy, oily seeds or the mesocarp of palm fruits (click here for illustration). More technically, a process known as trans-esterification converts the triacylglycerides to fatty acid methyl esters that can be directly used in engines. I hope to post on this too!

So what are the feedstocks current being exploited for advanced biofuels?

C3 vs C4 vs CAM plants
First, lets have little more plant education. One way in which plants can be classified is according to differences in their photosynthetic pathways. Photosynthesis is the use of the energy from sunlight to convert CO2 to an organic carbon molecule together with the release of oxygen.  With this type of classification, 3 groups occur: C3, C4 and CAM. The first molecule produced by the use of CO2 in C3 plants is a 3 carbon molecule and a 4 carbon molecule in C4 plants. C3 plants operate more efficiently under cool wet conditions while C4 plants are more water efficient and well adapted to dryer and hotter conditions. CAM (or Crasseulean Acid Metabolism) are even more water efficient and survive well in arid dessert climates. One of the ways in which water loss is minimised is through regulation of the gas exchange pores on the underside of the leave; these are called stomata. In C3 plants they are open all the time, in C4 plants stomata open only during the day when photosynthesis can occur but in CAM plants, stomata open only during the cooler night. CO2 is gathered and stored as crasseulic acid during the night and then used during the day. As water loss can occur through the stomata, regulating when they are open, regulates the loss of water. Most plants are C3 ( rice, wheat, soybeans, potatoes, beans, fruit trees). C4 plants include corn and many annual summer plants. CAM plants include catuses and agave plants.This is of course simply put. More details can be found in this article.

Non-woody perennials.
Popular contenders for cellulosic feedstock plants are the perennial grasses such as miscanthus, switch grass and elephant grass are all C4 plants and are more efficient at photosynthesis than C3 plants.

Miscanthus

Switchgrass

Additionally, their root system consist of a network of rhizomes that store energy and nutrients for the following season of growth allowing a fast regeneration time, drastically decreasing the amount of fertilizer needed and preventing soil erosion.  Further the perennial grasses under consideration are native to Amercia (including switch grass, Praries grass and Big and Little Bluegrass, suggesting that the Northern Plains and Southeastern grasslands could be a source of advanced biofuel.

Woody perennials. 
Woody perennials include fast growing trees such as Willow, SweetGum and Cottonwood.

Sweet Gum

Cottonwood

Like the perennial grasses they have several advantages over energy crops such as corn. First the amount of biomass produced for the same land area is much greater, they have better water use, don't require fertilization and deep root systems maintain soil structure and prevent erosion.  Secondly, some species such as willow and eucalyptus are amendable to the technique of coppicing, where the plants are cut down to near ground level every 3-5 years. This allows for increased biomass and these species rapidly regenerate from the storage system contained in their roots.

New bioenergy crops.
With modern agricultural practices and deforestation, large tracts of land have become semi arid. Plants such as the agave that uses CAM photosynthesis, is able to grow in such conditions and could be used to regenerate these semi-arid areas while providing a biofuel feedstock. Agave plants of different species have been under cultivation for many 100's of year for alcholic beverages (think Tequila!) and for sisal fibers to use in twine, paper, dartboards (!), handicrafts and mattresses for example. Sisal fibers could be a potential source for a biofuel feedstock.

Another problem with modern agriculture is the salinization of irrigated land and it is estimated 1-2% of irrigated land is lost every year. Highly salt tolerant plants such as prairie cordgrass and Eucalyptus species are potential feedstocks and could also be used to desalinate lost arable land.

Waste matter 
When I started considering biofuels from lignocellulosic feedstock, I was hopeful that a large proportion would be generated from the waste products of current industrial processes. To some extent this is true.
Firstly there is corn stover. Stover are the leftover inedible fibrous stalks and leaves after the cobs have been harvested. It is estimated that 13.5 billions gallons of ethanol could be generated from this stover. And while the bagasse produced after sugarcane harvesting in Brazil is not used as a feedstock but is burnt and leads to production of 2giga watts net electricity, this can also be classed as biofuel, just like wood burnt in your fireplace. However the costs of collection and transportation to processing plants of corn stover and the loss of nutrients and risk of soil erosion could make this economically and environmentally untenable though this view depends on where you get the information.

Many other crops such as wheat, rice and soybean leave a waste product called residue after the harvest. This is also a potential source of biofuel feedstock but is complicated by the same issues that are involved in corn stover collection in that the decay of the residue returns nutrients to the soil and prevents soil erosion by wind and rain. The ins and outs leading to an assessment of commerical viability are beyond the scope  of this post as they are many and complex. The 2011 US One Billion Update provides an in depth analysis of all the different aspects that need to be considered.

Wood waste
There are several sources of wood waste. The first if from timberland (forests used for logging) and this includes tree tops, branches, dead or rotten wood, small trees and non-commercial trees. This waste is normal left in the forest to decay but could provide a biofuel feedstock source. Careful management would be necessary as some of this waste wood provides a return of nutrients to the soil, habitats for insects and birds, fertiliser for new saplings and prevention of soil erosion.

Other wastewood comes from forest thinning in timberland areas and non-logging forests where biomass is removed to reduce the risk of forest fires becoming catastrophic. Waste wood is also generated when timberland is converted to non-forest land such as cropland and pasture roads. A last source of waste wood is from urban wood which includes furniture, landscaping, remodeling and construction. Much of this ends up in landfills. To me, that seems like a wonderful source for generating biofuel.

In the 2011 US One Billion Update, it is estimated that wood sources will produce up to 244 million tons of dry biomass.

Municipal waste (MSW)
This is the matter that everyone discards on a daily basis. Food scraps, paper waste, plastic etc.  From the point of view of biofuels, the most valuable items are paper and food. These need to be separated from the rest so despite the presence of a collection and transport system for MSW, the processing necessary in order to use it commercially as biofuel feedstock, is complicated. 

Animal Fat and Yellow grease.

Animal fats are generated from the slaughter of animals. However they are less valuable as a feedstock as they have a tendency to crystallize at lower temperatures. Yellow grease is the oil left over after cooking for example in restaurants and is a mixture of plant and animal fats. It is in limited supply but could be commercially viable for smaller biofuel operations.

The table shows the total and projected tons of biomass available from different feedstocks for ethanol and biodiesel (from 2011 US One Billion Update)






Current commercial operations
According to Environmental Leader, there are 11 competitive cellulosic ethanol plants currently operating and use of cellulosic feedstocks will be cost competitive with corn as a feedstock by 2016 and in fact many corn based plants are shutting down due to eroding profit margins. Wikipedia provides a table showing several companies in the US, their start dates and production capacities. A selection is shown in the table below and the feedstocks show that corn stover, wheat straw, wood waste and municiple waste are among the main ones in use.

Company	Location	Feedstock	Capacity (million gal/year)	Began Production	Type
Abengoa Bioenergy	Hugoton, KS	Wheat straw	25 - 30 [33][34]	est. late 2013	Commercial
DuPont	Nevada, IA	Corn stover	30[41]	est. 2014	Commercial
Fulcrum BioEnergy	Reno, NV	Municipal solid waste	10	est. end of 2013	Commercial
Gulf Coast Energy	Livingston, AL	Wood waste	0.3 [42]	before 2008	Demonstration
Mascoma	Kinross, MI	Wood waste	20	est. 2014	Commercial
POET LLC[43][44]	Emmetsburg, IA	Corn stover	20 - 25	est. lat 2013[45]	Commercial
POET LLC[46]	Scotland, SD	Corn stover	0.03	2008	Pilot

Concluding...this post
Cellulosic feedstocks are on a roll and there are many sources. I hope to have a closer look at these in coming posts and to bring in the bugs!

References and websites used:
Youngs and Somverville  2012, Development of feedstocks for cellulosic biofuels. F1000 Reports Biology. Volume 4, Issue 10.
Environmental Leader
Bloomberg New Energy Finance
Biofuels Digest
US One Billion Update
Wikipedia; various